Player Stats

Jaylen Harrell College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
74
TFL
20
Sacks
11
QB hurries
11
Passes defended
3

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonMichigan22-0--036.5
2021 PostseasonMichigan64-0--024.8
2021 Regular SeasonMichigan6112.501-024.8
2022 Regular SeasonMichigan11277.53.552064
2023 PostseasonMichigan13210--067.1
2023 Regular SeasonMichigan132897.551067.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Michigan paired 23.5 primary output with 27.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 27.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Indiana

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Michigan

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.8

Efficiency

27.7

Usage

9.7

Consistency

59.7

Best Game by takeover score

Indiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 1. East Carolina: 0. UNLV: 3. Bowling Green: 3. Rutgers: 0. Nebraska: 0. Minnesota: 1. Indiana: 4. Purdue: 3. Penn State: 2. Maryland: 2. Ohio State: 1. Iowa: 3.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 2 by 18.3. East Carolina: 2 by 8.3. UNLV: 5 by 50.8. Bowling Green: 2 by 38.3. Rutgers: 1 by 4.2. Nebraska: 2 by 8.3. Minnesota: 3 by 22.5. Indiana: 2 by 48.3. Purdue: 2 by 38.3. Penn State: 5 by 40.8. Maryland: 1 by 24.2. Ohio State: 1 by 14.2. Iowa: 2 by 43.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half1.1 · Games = 7 · -1.4 vs Second Half
Second Half2.6 · Games = 6 · +1.4 vs First Half