Usage Score
21.5
Player Dossier
2020-2022LSU
Kayshon Boutte
WR • 6'0" • 205 lbs • New Iberia, LA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Kayshon Boutte reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
66.2
Consistency
62
Season Value
56.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · LSU
202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kayshon Boutte, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · LSU. Kayshon Boutte reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kayshon Boutte played WR for LSU. Across 3 tracked seasons, Kayshon Boutte recorded 41 rushing yards, 1,735 receiving yards, and 4 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2020 with LSU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
LSU paired 509 primary output with 75.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 66.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · LSU
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
48.9
Efficiency
66.2
Usage
21.5
Consistency
62
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 20. Unknown: 42. Mississippi State: 31. Auburn: 4. Tennessee: 33. Florida: 115. Ole Miss: 43. Alabama: 51. Arkansas: 49. Texas A&M: 43. Georgia: 107
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 2 by 66.7. Unknown: 5 by 56. Mississippi State: 3 by 68.9. Auburn: 1 by 26.7. Tennessee: 6 by 36.7. Florida: 6 by 100. Ole Miss: 4 by 71.7. Alabama: 7 by 48.6. Arkansas: 4 by 81.7. Texas A&M: 4 by 71.7. Georgia: 6 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins48.8 · Games = 6 · -1.9 vs Losses
Losses50.8 · Games = 4 · +1.9 vs Wins
First Half40.8 · Games = 6 · -17.8 vs Second Half
Second Half58.6 · Games = 5 · +17.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/3 | @ Georgia100 receiving yards | L 30-50 | — | 6 | 107 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 53 |
| Sun 11/27 | @ Texas A&M | L 23-38 | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Arkansas | W 13-10 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Alabama | W 32-31 | — | 7 | 51 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Ole Miss | W 45-20 | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Florida100 receiving yards | W 45-35 | — | 6 | 115 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Tennessee | L 13-40 | — | 6 | 33 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Auburn | W 21-17 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Mississippi State | W 31-16 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 42 | 13.8 | 8.40 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Florida State | L 23-24 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2020-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | LSU | 688 | 76.2 | 18.4 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | LSU | 509 | 75.4 | 27.3 | -179 |
| 2022 Regular Season | LSU | 538 | 66.2 | 21.5 | 29 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ole Miss
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
308
Primary metric
308 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UCLA
148
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
148 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida
115
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Georgia
107
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Auburn
127
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · LSU
509 primary output · 75.4 efficiency · 27.3 usage
61.6
#2
2022 Regular Season · LSU
56.8
538 primary · 66.2 efficiency · 21.5 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · LSU
56.4
688 primary · 76.2 efficiency · 18.4 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.9892
Westgate · New Iberia, LA
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,735
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.