Player Stats

DeMonte Capehart College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
66
TFL
12
Sacks
3
QB hurries
7
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2020 Regular SeasonClemson1321--064.6
2021 Regular SeasonClemson00-0--0-
2022 Regular SeasonClemson5920--017.8
2023 PostseasonClemson91-0--052.5
2023 Regular SeasonClemson9134141052.5
2024 PostseasonClemson850.50--025.5
2024 Regular SeasonClemson8151012025.5
2025 Regular SeasonClemson11202.5122032.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Clemson paired 3 primary output with 42.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 14.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Troy

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · Clemson

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

14.4

Usage

3.5

Consistency

12.1

Best Game by takeover score

Troy

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. LSU: 0. Troy: 3. Georgia Tech: 1. Syracuse: 1. North Carolina: 0. Boston College: 0. SMU: 2. Duke: 0.5. Florida State: 0. Louisville: 0. Furman: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 1 by 4.2. Troy: 2 by 38.3. Georgia Tech: 6 by 35. Syracuse: 1 by 14.2. North Carolina: 1 by 4.2. Boston College: 1 by 4.2. SMU: 3 by 32.5. Duke: 1 by 9.2. Florida State: 1 by 4.2. Louisville: 2 by 8.3. Furman: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.5 · Games = 6 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · Games = 5 · +0.4 vs Wins