Player Stats

Dante Wright College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,970
Receptions
220
Touchdowns
19

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonColorado State1256802681.4
2020 Regular SeasonColorado State320315077.4
2021 Regular SeasonColorado State944554368.2
2022 Regular SeasonColorado State0-00-
2023 Regular SeasonTemple1139507461.6
2024 Regular SeasonTemple861792689.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

Temple paired 792 primary output with 77.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 77.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Colorado State, Temple.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 87.5th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Temple

Games

8

Receiving Yards / G

99

Efficiency

77.8

Usage

39.4

Consistency

80.7

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 36. Navy: 101. Coastal Carolina: 99. Utah State: 116. Army: 98. UConn: 67. Florida Atlantic: 147. UTSA: 128

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 3 by 80. Navy: 11 by 61.2. Coastal Carolina: 9 by 73.3. Utah State: 3 by 100. Army: 8 by 81.7. UConn: 8 by 55.8. Florida Atlantic: 14 by 70. UTSA: 5 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins131.5 · Games = 2 · +43.3 vs Losses
Losses88.2 · Games = 6 · -43.3 vs Wins