Player Stats

Craig Woodson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
246
TFL
9.5
Sacks
0.5
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
16
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonCalifornia22-0--036.7
2020 Regular SeasonCalifornia418-0-2030
2021 Regular SeasonCalifornia00-0--0-
2022 Regular SeasonCalifornia12763023260.1
2023 PostseasonCalifornia131-0-1043.7
2023 Regular SeasonCalifornia137940.5-3043.7
2024 PostseasonCalifornia123-01-062.7
2024 Regular SeasonCalifornia12672.50-7062.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

California paired 12.5 primary output with 34.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 34.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · California

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.0

Efficiency

34.7

Usage

6.7

Consistency

60.3

Best Game by takeover score

Miami

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 1. UC Davis: 0. Auburn: 0. Florida State: 0.5. Miami: 3. Pittsburgh: 1. NC State: 1.5. Oregon State: 1.5. Wake Forest: 1. Syracuse: 0. Stanford: 1. SMU: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 3 by 22.5. UC Davis: 4 by 16.7. Auburn: 6 by 25. Florida State: 7 by 34.2. Miami: 8 by 63.3. Pittsburgh: 6 by 35. NC State: 4 by 31.7. Oregon State: 3 by 27.5. Wake Forest: 5 by 30.8. Syracuse: 7 by 29.2. Stanford: 10 by 51.7. SMU: 7 by 49.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.7 · Games = 5 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 7 · +0.6 vs Wins