Player Dossier

2019-2024

UAB

Lee Witherspoon

RB • 5'11" • 225 lbs • Birmingham, AL, USA

Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover

Lee Witherspoon leans balanced backfield option traits and 44.3 efficiency.

Usage Score

6.7

Efficiency

44.3

Consistency

49.6

Season Value

49.9

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · UAB

191920202122222324

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
9
Program Path
Mississippi State • UAB
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Missouri

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Lee Witherspoon, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · UAB. Lee Witherspoon leans balanced backfield option traits and 44.3 efficiency.

Lee Witherspoon played RB for Mississippi State and UAB. Across 6 tracked seasons, Lee Witherspoon recorded 433 rushing yards, 135 receiving yards, and 8 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with UAB.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

UAB paired 178 primary output with 44.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 44.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Mississippi State, UAB.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte

Loss with 37 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · UAB

Games

10

Scrimmage Yards / G

17.8

Efficiency

44.3

Usage

6.7

Consistency

49.6

Best Game by takeover score

Charlotte

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 43. UL Monroe: 8. Navy: 18. Tulane: 3. Army: 12. South Florida: 9. UConn: 16. Memphis: -1. Rice: 33. Charlotte: 37

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 8 by 58.9. UL Monroe: 2 by 41.7. Navy: 3 by 62.5. Tulane: 2 by 15.6. Army: 5 by 25. South Florida: 4 by 23.4. UConn: 2 by 83.3. Memphis: 1 by 0. Rice: 7 by 55.9. Charlotte: 5 by 77.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Losses12.8 · Games = 8
First Half16.8 · Games = 5 · -2 vs Second Half
Second Half18.8 · Games = 5 · +2 vs First Half
All Games17.8 · Games = 10

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

10 games

Featured metric

Scrimmage Yards

Top game by takeover score

Charlotte

Best efficiency game

83.3 vs UConn

Result
Sat 11/30@ CharlotteL 27-295377.4007.4
Sat 11/23vs RiceW 40-145295.800244.7
Sun 11/17@ MemphisL 18-531-1-10-1
Sat 11/9vs UConnL 23-31216808
Sat 10/19@ South FloridaL 25-35492.3002.3
Sat 10/12@ ArmyL 10-445122.4002.4
Sat 10/5vs TulaneL 20-71231.5001.5
Sat 9/28vs NavyL 18-41318606
Sat 9/7@ UL MonroeL 6-3228404
Fri 8/30vs Unknown6355.800285.4

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Mississippi State

    2019-2020

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    UAB

    2021-2024

    Final stop

Season Progression

201920192020202020212022202220232024
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2019 PostseasonMississippi State13852.84.6
2019 Regular SeasonMississippi State13852.84.60
2020 PostseasonMississippi State8443.74-54
2020 Regular SeasonMississippi State8443.740
2021 Regular SeasonUAB0-84
2022 PostseasonUAB7939.27.479
2022 Regular SeasonUAB7939.27.40
2023 Regular SeasonUAB8932.74.210
2024 Regular SeasonUAB17844.36.789

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Missouri

Win with 26 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

26

Primary metric

26 scrimmage yards and 6.1 usage.

#2

Unknown

53

Primary metric

Game with 53 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

53 scrimmage yards and 16 usage.

#3

Southern Miss

40

Primary metric

Win with 40 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

40 scrimmage yards and 12.3 usage.

#4

Charlotte

37

Primary metric

Loss with 37 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

37 scrimmage yards and 7.9 usage.

#5

Unknown

43

Primary metric

Game with 43 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

43 scrimmage yards and 10.5 usage.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2024 Regular Season · UAB

178 primary output · 44.3 efficiency · 6.7 usage

49.9

#2

2019 Postseason · Mississippi State

48.2

138 primary · 52.8 efficiency · 4.6 usage

#3

2019 Regular Season · Mississippi State

48.2

138 primary · 52.8 efficiency · 4.6 usage

Milestones

0

100+ rush yards

0

150+ scrimmage yards

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2025 · Rating 0.8744

Warren · Warren, AR

Committed To
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2025

Career Facts

2

Career teams

9

Seasons tracked

568

Career Scrimmage Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.