Usage Score
22.7
Player Dossier
2019-2022Cincinnati
Tre Tucker
WR • 5'9" • 185 lbs • Akron, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tre Tucker reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.1
Consistency
67.4
Season Value
66.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Cincinnati
19192020212122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tre Tucker, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Tre Tucker reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 672 primary output with 79.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 79.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
56
Efficiency
79.1
Usage
22.7
Consistency
67.4
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 66. Unknown: 12. Miami (OH): 105. Indiana: 92. Tulsa: 48. South Florida: 64. SMU: 9. UCF: 110. Navy: 24. East Carolina: 64. Temple: 78. Tulane: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 4 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 80. Miami (OH): 7 by 100. Indiana: 5 by 100. Tulsa: 5 by 64. South Florida: 7 by 61. SMU: 1 by 60. UCF: 10 by 73.3. Navy: 5 by 32. East Carolina: 3 by 100. Temple: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins60.5 · n=8 · +1.8 vs Losses
Losses58.7 · n=3 · -1.8 vs Wins
First Half64.5 · n=6 · +17 vs Second Half
Second Half47.5 · n=6 · -17 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | vs Tulane | L 24-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Temple | W 23-3 | — | 4 | 78 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs East Carolina | W 27-25 | — | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 1 | 55 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Navy | W 20-10 | — | 5 | 24 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ UCF100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-25 | — | 10 | 110 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ SMU | W 29-27 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs South Florida | W 28-24 | — | 7 | 64 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Tulsa | W 31-21 | — | 5 | 48 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Indiana | W 45-24 | — | 5 | 92 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Miami (OH)100 receiving yards | W 38-17 | — | 7 | 105 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Arkansas | L 24-31 | — | 4 | 66 | 14.8 | 16.50 | 0 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
2019201920202020202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Cincinnati | 92 | 53.3 | 9.5 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 92 | 53.3 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Cincinnati | 236 | 75.4 | 10.4 | 144 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 236 | 75.4 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Cincinnati | 426 | 70.5 | 13.2 | 190 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 426 | 70.5 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 672 | 79.1 | 22.7 | 246 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114
Primary metric
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami (OH)
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UCF
110
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Marshall
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Cincinnati
672 primary output · 79.1 efficiency · 22.7 usage
66.7
#2
2021 Postseason · Cincinnati
46.2
426 primary · 70.5 efficiency · 13.2 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Cincinnati
46.2
426 primary · 70.5 efficiency · 13.2 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8606
Walnut Grove · Monroe, GA
- Committed To
- Kentucky
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,426
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.