Player Stats

Dino Tomlin College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
552
Receptions
40

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonMaryland117041
2020 Regular SeasonMaryland0-00-
2021 Regular SeasonMaryland3212016.6
2022 Regular SeasonBoston College710181062.3
2023 PostseasonBoston College10-0075.6
2023 Regular SeasonBoston College1024312075.6
2024 PostseasonBoston College3110035.9
2024 Regular SeasonBoston College3230035.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Boston College paired 312 primary output with 80.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 66.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Maryland, Boston College.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: SMU

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Boston College

Games

3

Receiving Yards / G

13.3

Efficiency

66.7

Usage

4.8

Consistency

48.2

Best Game by takeover score

SMU

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 10. SMU: 25. Pittsburgh: 5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 1 by 66.7. SMU: 1 by 100. Pittsburgh: 1 by 33.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins5 · Games = 1 · -12.5 vs Losses
Losses17.5 · Games = 2 · +12.5 vs Wins