Player Stats

Jalen Thornton College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
24
TFL
5
Sacks
3
QB hurries
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonWest Virginia00-0--0-
2020 Regular SeasonWest Virginia34-0--038.3
2021 PostseasonWest Virginia31-0--037
2021 Regular SeasonWest Virginia32-0--037
2022 Regular SeasonWest Virginia23-0--038.5
2023 PostseasonWest Virginia941.51.52-044.5
2023 Regular SeasonWest Virginia9103.51.5--044.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

West Virginia paired 10 primary output with 17.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 17.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · West Virginia

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

1.1

Efficiency

17.6

Usage

5.4

Consistency

14.8

Best Game by takeover score

North Carolina

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 5. Pittsburgh: 0. TCU: 1. Oklahoma State: 0. UCF: 0. BYU: 0. Oklahoma: 3. Cincinnati: 0. Baylor: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 4 by 66.7. Pittsburgh: 1 by 4.2. TCU: 1 by 14.2. Oklahoma State: 2 by 8.3. BYU: 1 by 4.2. Oklahoma: 3 by 42.5. Cincinnati: 1 by 4.2. Baylor: 1 by 14.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 7 · -0.5 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 2 · +0.5 vs Wins