Player Stats

Marcus Stripling College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
34
TFL
10
Sacks
7
QB hurries
7
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonOklahoma66111-021
2020 Regular SeasonOklahoma783.52.5--036.8
2021 PostseasonOklahoma44212-049.4
2021 Regular SeasonOklahoma420.50-1049.4
2022 Regular SeasonOklahoma880.503-029.4
2023 PostseasonOklahoma7111--035.8
2023 Regular SeasonOklahoma751.51.51-035.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Oklahoma paired 6.5 primary output with 22.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 12.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Oklahoma

Games

7

Havoc Plays / G

0.9

Efficiency

12.2

Usage

2.9

Consistency

14.3

Best Game by takeover score

Iowa State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 2. Arkansas State: 0. Tulsa: 2. Cincinnati: 0. Iowa State: 2. Kansas: 0. TCU: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 1 by 24.2. Arkansas State: 1 by 4.2. Tulsa: 1 by 24.2. Cincinnati: 1 by 4.2. Iowa State: 1 by 24.2. TCU: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 2 · +0.2 vs Wins