Usage Score
22.1
Player Dossier
2019-2023Texas A&M
Ainias Smith
WR • 5'10" • 200 lbs • Sugar Land, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ainias Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.1
Consistency
71.8
Season Value
69.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Texas A&M
19192020212223
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ainias Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Ainias Smith reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 795 primary output with 88.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 88.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
66.3
Efficiency
88.1
Usage
22.1
Consistency
71.8
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 40. Miami: 27. UL Monroe: 127. Auburn: 78. Arkansas: 71. Alabama: 88. Tennessee: 20. South Carolina: 118. Ole Miss: 83. Mississippi State: 64. Unknown: 20. LSU: 59
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 3 by 88.9. Miami: 3 by 60. UL Monroe: 7 by 100. Auburn: 5 by 100. Arkansas: 4 by 100. Alabama: 4 by 100. Tennessee: 1 by 100. South Carolina: 6 by 100. Ole Miss: 6 by 92.2. Mississippi State: 4 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 66.7. LSU: 8 by 49.2
Split Comparison
Wins83 · n=6 · +27.6 vs Losses
Losses55.4 · n=5 · -27.6 vs Wins
First Half71.8 · n=6 · +11.2 vs Second Half
Second Half60.7 · n=6 · -11.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Mississippi State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ LSUHigh volume | L 30-42 | — | 8 | 59 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Mississippi State | W 51-10 | — | 4 | 64 | 13.6 | 16 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Ole Miss | L 35-38 | — | 6 | 83 | 13.4 | 13.80 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs South Carolina100 receiving yards | W 30-17 | — | 6 | 118 | 17 | 19.70 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Tennessee | L 13-20 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Alabama | L 20-26 | — | 4 | 88 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Arkansas | W 34-22 | — | 4 | 71 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Auburn | W 27-10 | — | 5 | 78 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs UL Monroe100 receiving yards | W 47-3 | — | 7 | 127 | 14.7 | 18.10 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Miami | L 33-48 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs New Mexico | W 52-10 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 27 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
2019201920202020202120222023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Texas A&M | 248 | 72.1 | 14.5 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 248 | 72.1 | 14.5 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Texas A&M | 490 | 66.8 | 23.5 | 242 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 490 | 66.8 | 23.5 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 509 | 68.6 | 22.5 | 19 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 291 | 83.8 | 26.5 | -218 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 795 | 88.1 | 22.1 | 504 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125
Primary metric
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
164
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Carolina
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UL Monroe
127
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arkansas
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Texas A&M
795 primary output · 88.1 efficiency · 22.1 usage
69.7
#2
2021 Regular Season · Texas A&M
52.7
509 primary · 68.6 efficiency · 22.5 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Texas A&M
48.5
291 primary · 83.8 efficiency · 26.5 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8728
South Sumter · Bushnell, FL
- Committed To
- UCF
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,333
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.