Usage Score
18.2
Player Dossier
2019-2022Bowling Green
TE • 6'4" • 240 lbs • Norcross, GA, USA
Christian Sims reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.2
Efficiency
65.8
Consistency
75
Season Value
64.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Christian Sims, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Christian Sims reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
38.2
Efficiency
65.8
Usage
18.2
Consistency
75
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico State: 56. UCLA: 33. Unknown: 46. Marshall: 25. Akron: 12. Buffalo: 53. Miami (OH): 20. Central Michigan: 24. Western Michigan: 41. Kent State: 68. Toledo: 35. Ohio: 45
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico State: 4 by 93.3. UCLA: 4 by 55. Unknown: 4 by 76.7. Marshall: 5 by 33.3. Akron: 3 by 26.7. Buffalo: 4 by 88.3. Miami (OH): 3 by 44.4. Central Michigan: 3 by 53.3. Western Michigan: 4 by 68.3. Kent State: 6 by 75.6. Toledo: 1 by 100. Ohio: 4 by 75
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/26 | vs New Mexico State | L 19-24 | — | 4 | 56 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 21 |
| Wed 11/23 | @ Ohio | L 14-38 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Wed 11/16 | @ Toledo | W 42-35 | — | 1 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 0 | 35 |
| Thu 11/10 | vs Kent State | L 6-40 | — | 6 | 68 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Wed 11/2 | vs Western Michigan | W 13-9 | — | 4 | 41 | 9.2 | 10.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Central Michigan | W 34-18 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Miami (OH) | W 17-13 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Buffalo | L 7-38 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Akron | W 31-28 | — | 3 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Marshall | W 34-31 | — | 5 | 25 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 46 | 9.6 | 11.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ UCLA | L 17-45 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 22 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 72 | 52.7 | 11.8 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | -72 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 418 | 65.1 | 22.9 | 418 |
| 2022 Postseason | Bowling Green | 458 | 65.8 | 18.2 | 40 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 458 | 65.8 | 18.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103
Primary metric
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami (OH)
32
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico State
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Kent State
68
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 75.6 efficiency score.
#5
Buffalo
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Bowling Green
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2022 Postseason · Bowling Green
64.8
458 primary · 65.8 efficiency · 18.2 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Bowling Green
64.8
458 primary · 65.8 efficiency · 18.2 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.7683
Norcross · Norcross, GA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
948
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Christian Sims quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit