Usage Score
8.3
Player Dossier
2019-2023Michigan
Mike Sainristil
DB • 5'10" • 182 lbs • Everett, MA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Mike Sainristil shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25 disruption score.
Efficiency
25
Consistency
49.3
Season Value
22.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Michigan
191920212122222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mike Sainristil, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Michigan. Mike Sainristil shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Michigan paired 0 primary output with 1.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 25 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Michigan
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
25
Usage
8.3
Consistency
49.3
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 1. Alabama: 1. East Carolina: 1. UNLV: 1. Bowling Green: 3. Rutgers: 1. Minnesota: 1.5. Indiana: 1. Michigan State: 2. Purdue: 0.5. Penn State: 0. Maryland: 2. Ohio State: 1. Iowa: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 6 by 35. East Carolina: 1 by 14.2. UNLV: 5 by 30.8. Bowling Green: 3 by 42.5. Rutgers: 2 by 18.3. Minnesota: 2 by 23.3. Indiana: 3 by 22.5. Michigan State: 2 by 28.3. Purdue: 3 by 17.5. Penn State: 1 by 4.2. Maryland: 3 by 32.5. Ohio State: 3 by 22.5. Iowa: 2 by 38.3
Split Comparison
Wins1.4 · n=14
First Half1.4 · n=7 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · n=7 · +0 vs First Half
All Games1.4 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
42.5 vs Bowling Green
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/9 | vs Washington | W 34-13 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Mon 1/1 | vs Alabama | W 27-20 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/3 | @ Iowa | W 26-0 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Ohio State | W 30-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ MarylandSplash game | W 31-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Penn State | W 24-15 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Purdue | W 41-13 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Michigan State | W 49-0 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Indiana | W 52-7 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Minnesota | W 52-10 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Rutgers | W 31-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Bowling GreenSplash game | W 31-6 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs UNLV | W 35-7 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs East Carolina | W 30-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920192020202120212022202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan | 0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Michigan | 0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Michigan | 15.5 | 27.3 | 7.9 | 15.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan | 15.5 | 27.3 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Michigan | 19 | 25 | 8.3 | 3.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Michigan | 19 | 25 | 8.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Maryland
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 65.8 takeover score.
#2
Bowling Green
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.2 takeover score.
#3
Iowa
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.4 takeover score.
#4
Maryland
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 36.9 takeover score.
#5
Ohio State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 34.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Michigan
0 primary output · 1.5 efficiency · 0.3 usage
33.9
#2
2021 Regular Season · Michigan
33.9
0 primary · 1.5 efficiency · 0.3 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Michigan
33.6
0 primary · 0.7 efficiency · 0.1 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8794
Demopolis · Demopolis, AL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
90
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.