Usage Score
6.9
Player Dossier
2019-2023Wisconsin
Hayden Rucci
TE • 6'4" • 253 lbs • Lititz, PA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Hayden Rucci reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
55.4
Consistency
27.9
Season Value
47.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Wisconsin
19202122222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Wisconsin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Southern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Hayden Rucci, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Wisconsin. Hayden Rucci reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Hayden Rucci played TE for Wisconsin. Across 5 tracked seasons, Hayden Rucci recorded 200 receiving yards, 2 tackles, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Wisconsin.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Wisconsin paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 55.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Southern
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Wisconsin
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
13.9
Efficiency
55.4
Usage
6.9
Consistency
27.9
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 13. Washington State: 5. Georgia Southern: 51. Purdue: 0. Rutgers: 11. Iowa: 5. Illinois: 7. Northwestern: 1. Minnesota: 32
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 1 by 86.7. Washington State: 1 by 33.3. Georgia Southern: 2 by 100. Rutgers: 2 by 36.7. Iowa: 1 by 33.3. Illinois: 1 by 46.7. Northwestern: 1 by 6.7. Minnesota: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins20.2 · Games = 5 · +14.2 vs Losses
Losses6 · Games = 4 · -14.2 vs Wins
First Half16 · Games = 5 · +4.8 vs Second Half
Second Half11.3 · Games = 4 · -4.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia Southern
Best efficiency game
100 vs Minnesota
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | @ LSU | L 31-35 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Minnesota | W 28-14 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Northwestern | L 10-24 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Illinois | W 25-21 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Iowa | L 6-15 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Rutgers | W 24-13 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Fri 9/22 | @ Purdue | W 38-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Georgia Southern | W 35-14 | — | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Washington State | L 22-31 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wisconsin
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
2019202020212022202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Wisconsin | 75 | 83.3 | 13.1 | 75 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 75 | 83.3 | 13.1 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Wisconsin | 125 | 55.4 | 6.9 | 50 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 125 | 55.4 | 6.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia Southern
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51
Primary metric
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma State
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
27
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
32
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico State
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Wisconsin
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2022 Postseason · Wisconsin
64.4
75 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 13.1 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Wisconsin
64.4
75 primary · 83.3 efficiency · 13.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8867
Tampa Bay Tech · Tampa, FL
- Committed To
- UCF
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
200
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.