Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2019-2023Ole Miss
CB • 6'0" • 185 lbs • Charleston, MS, USA
Deantre Prince shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.2
Efficiency
20.8
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
26.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Ole Miss
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Deantre Prince, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Ole Miss. Deantre Prince shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20.8 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Ole Miss paired 12 primary output with 24.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 20.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
20.8
Usage
5.2
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 0. Unknown: 0. Tulane: 3. Georgia Tech: 1. Alabama: 0. LSU: 0. Arkansas: 2. Auburn: 2. Vanderbilt: 1. Texas A&M: 0. Georgia: 1. UL Monroe: 0. Mississippi State: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Tulane: 3 by 42.5. Georgia Tech: 4 by 26.7. Alabama: 5 by 20.8. LSU: 2 by 8.3. Arkansas: 4 by 36.7. Auburn: 1 by 24.2. Vanderbilt: 1 by 14.2. Texas A&M: 6 by 25. Georgia: 2 by 18.3. UL Monroe: 2 by 8.3. Mississippi State: 2 by 28.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
42.5 vs Tulane
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | @ Penn State | W 38-25 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Mississippi State | W 17-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs UL Monroe | W 35-3 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Georgia | L 17-52 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Texas A&M | W 38-35 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Vanderbilt | W 33-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Auburn | W 28-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs ArkansasSplash game | W 27-20 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs LSU | W 55-49 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Alabama | L 10-24 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Georgia Tech | W 48-23 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Tulane | W 37-20 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ole Miss
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 4 | 14.4 | 2.9 | — |
| 2021 Postseason | Ole Miss | 5 | 18.3 | 3.1 | 1 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 5 | 18.3 | 3.1 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 12 | 24.5 | 3 | 7 |
| 2023 Postseason | Ole Miss | 12 | 20.8 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 12 | 20.8 | 5.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.2 takeover score.
#2
Vanderbilt
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#3
Tulane
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.9 takeover score.
#4
LSU
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 49.8 takeover score.
#5
Texas A&M
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Ole Miss
12 primary output · 24.5 efficiency · 3 usage
26.6
#2
2023 Postseason · Ole Miss
26.1
12 primary · 20.8 efficiency · 5.2 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Ole Miss
26.1
12 primary · 20.8 efficiency · 5.2 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8893
Charleston · Charleston, MS
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
142
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Deantre Prince quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit