Player Stats

Isaiah Neyor College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,595
Receptions
87
Touchdowns
18

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonWyoming0-00-
2020 Regular SeasonWyoming48248064.4
2021 PostseasonWyoming13587190
2021 Regular SeasonWyoming13397911290
2022 Regular SeasonTexas0-00-
2023 Regular SeasonTexas1114052.5
2024 Regular SeasonNebraska1134455549.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Wyoming paired 878 primary output with 93.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 67.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wyoming, Texas, Nebraska.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTEP

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Nebraska

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

41.4

Efficiency

67.1

Usage

13.7

Consistency

33

Best Game by takeover score

UTEP

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UTEP: 121. Colorado: 31. Northern Iowa: 35. Illinois: 90. Purdue: 14. Indiana: 13. Ohio State: 15. UCLA: 89. USC: 18. Wisconsin: 22. Iowa: 7

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTEP: 6 by 100. Colorado: 4 by 51.7. Northern Iowa: 2 by 100. Illinois: 4 by 100. Purdue: 1 by 93.3. Indiana: 2 by 43.3. Ohio State: 2 by 50. UCLA: 4 by 100. USC: 3 by 40. Wisconsin: 4 by 36.7. Iowa: 2 by 23.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins44.6 · Games = 5 · +5.9 vs Losses
Losses38.7 · Games = 6 · -5.9 vs Wins