Player Stats

Eli Neal College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
365
TFL
31.5
Sacks
12.5
QB hurries
23
Passes defended
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonMarshall6120.50--07.5
2020 PostseasonMarshall105-0--050.4
2020 Regular SeasonMarshall107051.521050.4
2021 PostseasonMarshall135-0--067
2021 Regular SeasonMarshall139275.593067
2022 Regular SeasonMarshall12888392069.7
2023 PostseasonMarshall13810--066.4
2023 Regular SeasonMarshall1385102.532066.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Marshall paired 23 primary output with 49 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 44.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama

Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · Marshall

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.6

Efficiency

44.9

Usage

10.2

Consistency

55.1

Best Game by takeover score

South Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 2. UAlbany: 1. East Carolina: 2. Virginia Tech: 2. Old Dominion: 4. NC State: 0. Georgia State: 0. James Madison: 0.5. Coastal Carolina: 0. App State: 2. Georgia Southern: 2. South Alabama: 4.5. Arkansas State: 0.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 8 by 53.3. UAlbany: 7 by 39.2. East Carolina: 7 by 49.2. Virginia Tech: 10 by 61.7. Old Dominion: 3 by 52.5. NC State: 7 by 29.2. Georgia State: 4 by 16.7. James Madison: 8 by 38.3. Coastal Carolina: 7 by 29.2. App State: 2 by 28.3. Georgia Southern: 9 by 57.5. South Alabama: 14 by 95. Arkansas State: 7 by 34.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.9 · Games = 6 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 7 · -0.6 vs Wins