Player Stats

Tre'Mon Morris-Brash College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
168
TFL
51.1
Sacks
26
QB hurries
16
Passes defended
5
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 PostseasonUCF8320--143.5
2019 Regular SeasonUCF8165.532-043.5
2020 PostseasonUCF101-0--035.2
2020 Regular SeasonUCF102563.51-035.2
2021 PostseasonUCF102-02-059
2021 Regular SeasonUCF102110.1521059
2022 Regular SeasonUCF125012673076.5
2023 PostseasonUCF11620--074.6
2023 Regular SeasonUCF114413.58.521074.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

UCF paired 28 primary output with 40.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 42.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Baylor

Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · UCF

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

2.5

Efficiency

42.6

Usage

18.6

Consistency

59.4

Best Game by takeover score

Baylor

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 2. Villanova: 3. Kansas State: 2.5. Baylor: 6. Kansas: 0. Oklahoma: 4. West Virginia: 0. Cincinnati: 5. Oklahoma State: 0.5. Texas Tech: 2. Houston: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 6 by 45. Villanova: 4 by 46.7. Kansas State: 2 by 33.3. Baylor: 6 by 75. Kansas: 3 by 12.5. Oklahoma: 8 by 73.3. West Virginia: 6 by 25. Cincinnati: 5 by 70.8. Oklahoma State: 3 by 17.5. Texas Tech: 2 by 28.3. Houston: 5 by 40.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.6 · Games = 4 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses2.4 · Games = 7 · -0.3 vs Wins