Player Stats

Myron Morrison College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
199
TFL
16
Sacks
4
QB hurries
11
Passes defended
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonRice11-0--037.2
2020 Regular SeasonRice00-0--0-
2021 Regular SeasonRice11342012023.4
2022 Regular SeasonRice10675.51.523074.4
2023 PostseasonRice119-01-055
2023 Regular SeasonRice11592.513-055
2024 Regular SeasonRice82961.54-058.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Rice paired 14 primary output with 40.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 29.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UTSA

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Rice

Games

8

Havoc Plays / G

1.4

Efficiency

29.5

Usage

7.8

Consistency

56.5

Best Game by takeover score

UTSA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Sam Houston: 3. Texas Southern: 2. Houston: 0. Charlotte: 1. UTSA: 3. Tulane: 0.5. UAB: 0. South Florida: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Sam Houston: 3 by 42.5. Texas Southern: 4 by 36.7. Houston: 2 by 8.3. Charlotte: 1 by 14.2. UTSA: 5 by 50.8. Tulane: 7 by 34.2. UAB: 3 by 12.5. South Florida: 4 by 36.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.3 · Games = 3 · +1.4 vs Losses
Losses0.9 · Games = 5 · -1.4 vs Wins