Player Stats

JaTravis Broughton College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
152
TFL
5
Sacks
1
Passes defended
12

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 PostseasonUtah61-0--014.9
2019 Regular SeasonUtah67-0--014.9
2020 Regular SeasonUtah42110-4066.3
2021 Regular SeasonUtah2910-2054.1
2022 Regular SeasonUtah113921-1035.9
2023 PostseasonUtah121-0--026.4
2023 Regular SeasonUtah123610-2026.4
2024 PostseasonTCU93-0--028.1
2024 Regular SeasonTCU935-0-3028.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season

Utah paired 5 primary output with 34.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 20.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Utah, TCU.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Stanford

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · TCU

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

0.3

Efficiency

20.9

Usage

2.9

Consistency

7.4

Best Game by takeover score

Stanford

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Louisiana: 0. Stanford: 2. UCF: 0. SMU: 1. Houston: 0. Utah: 0. Texas Tech: 0. Oklahoma State: 0. Arizona: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana: 3 by 12.5. Stanford: 4 by 36.7. UCF: 12 by 50. SMU: 9 by 47.5. Houston: 2 by 8.3. Utah: 1 by 4.2. Texas Tech: 4 by 16.7. Oklahoma State: 2 by 8.3. Arizona: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.3 · Games = 6 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 3 · +0 vs Wins