Player Stats

DeJordan Mask College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
144
TFL
2.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonTexas State65-0--035.9
2020 Regular SeasonTexas State9490.50-4034.3
2021 Regular SeasonTexas State1140-012028.5
2022 Regular SeasonTexas State124220-2046.9
2023 Regular SeasonUCF48-0--012.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Texas State paired 7 primary output with 20.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 13.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas State, UCF.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kent State

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · UCF

Games

4

Havoc Plays / G

0.3

Efficiency

13.4

Usage

1.9

Consistency

8.3

Best Game by takeover score

Kent State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 1. Kansas State: 0. Baylor: 0. Oklahoma: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 4 by 16.7. Baylor: 1 by 4.2. Oklahoma: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 1 · +1 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · -1 vs Wins