Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Iowa paired 299 primary output with 77.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 33.2 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 5 | 12 | 82 | 0 | 38.2 |
| 2021 Postseason | Michigan | 12 | 4 | 63 | 0 | 69 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 12 | 34 | 374 | 2 | 69 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan | 3 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 38.3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Iowa | 7 | 21 | 299 | 3 | 74.9 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Iowa paired 299 primary output with 77.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Iowa.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
42.7
Efficiency
77.9
Usage
35.1
Consistency
53.1
Best Game by takeover score
Purdue
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 15. Iowa State: 32. Western Michigan: 34. Penn State: 35. Michigan State: 67. Purdue: 97. Wisconsin: 19
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 3 by 33.3. Iowa State: 3 by 71.1. Western Michigan: 1 by 100. Penn State: 3 by 77.8. Michigan State: 4 by 100. Purdue: 5 by 100. Wisconsin: 2 by 63.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.