Usage Score
35.1
Player Dossier
2019-2023Michigan
TE • 6'5" • 250 lbs • Fairfield, OH, USA
Erick All reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
35.1
Efficiency
77.9
Consistency
53.1
Season Value
61.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Iowa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Erick All, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Iowa. Erick All reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Iowa paired 299 primary output with 77.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Iowa.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
42.7
Efficiency
77.9
Usage
35.1
Consistency
53.1
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 15. Iowa State: 32. Western Michigan: 34. Penn State: 35. Michigan State: 67. Purdue: 97. Wisconsin: 19
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 3 by 33.3. Iowa State: 3 by 71.1. Western Michigan: 1 by 100. Penn State: 3 by 77.8. Michigan State: 4 by 100. Purdue: 5 by 100. Wisconsin: 2 by 63.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs Purdue
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2019-2022
Opening stop
Iowa
2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 10 | 66.7 | 4.2 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 82 | 46.1 | 11.7 | 72 |
| 2021 Postseason | Michigan | 437 | 72.3 | 16.5 | 355 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 437 | 72.3 | 16.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan | 36 | 64.5 | 5.4 | -401 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Iowa | 299 | 77.9 | 35.1 | 263 |
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97
Primary metric
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Minnesota
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado State
22
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
98
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 65.3 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan State
67
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Iowa
299 primary output · 77.9 efficiency · 35.1 usage
61.3
#2
2021 Postseason · Michigan
59.3
437 primary · 72.3 efficiency · 16.5 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Michigan
59.3
437 primary · 72.3 efficiency · 16.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8978
Fairfield · Fairfield, OH
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
864
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Erick All quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit