Player Stats

Desmond Little College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
86
TFL
20.5
Sacks
14.5
QB hurries
10
Passes defended
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonLSU00-0--0-
2020 Regular SeasonLSU00-0--0-
2021 Regular SeasonLSU31032.5--051.8
2022 Regular SeasonLSU16-0-1042.9
2023 Regular SeasonUAB10308632069.4
2024 Regular SeasonUAB11409.5673072.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season

UAB paired 25.5 primary output with 37 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 37 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across LSU, UAB.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa

Win with 6.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · UAB

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

2.3

Efficiency

37

Usage

14.4

Consistency

52.6

Best Game by takeover score

Tulsa

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alcorn State: 3. UL Monroe: 1. Arkansas: 2. Navy: 0.5. Tulane: 0. Army: 1. South Florida: 2. Tulsa: 6.5. UConn: 5. Memphis: 1. Rice: 3.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alcorn State: 3 by 42.5. UL Monroe: 5 by 30.8. Arkansas: 5 by 40.8. Navy: 4 by 21.7. Tulane: 1 by 4.2. Army: 5 by 30.8. South Florida: 5 by 40.8. Tulsa: 4 by 66.7. UConn: 3 by 62.5. Memphis: 2 by 18.3. Rice: 3 by 47.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins4.3 · Games = 3 · +2.8 vs Losses
Losses1.6 · Games = 8 · -2.8 vs Wins