Usage Score
11.6
Player Dossier
2019-2023Syracuse
Lee Kpogba
LB • 6'1" • 234 lbs • Winston-salem, NC, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Lee Kpogba shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
39.6
Consistency
34.2
Season Value
24.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Syracuse
192021222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Syracuse • West Virginia
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lee Kpogba, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Syracuse. Lee Kpogba shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Syracuse paired 0 primary output with 4.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 39.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Syracuse, West Virginia.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: TCU
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · West Virginia
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
39.6
Usage
11.6
Consistency
34.2
Best Game by takeover score
North Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 1. Penn State: 1.5. Unknown: 0. Pittsburgh: 0. Texas Tech: 0. TCU: 3. Houston: 0. Oklahoma State: 0.5. UCF: 2. BYU: 1.5. Oklahoma: 0. Cincinnati: 2. Baylor: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 12 by 60. Penn State: 13 by 65. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Pittsburgh: 7 by 29.2. Texas Tech: 7 by 29.2. TCU: 11 by 75.8. Houston: 6 by 25. Oklahoma State: 5 by 25.8. UCF: 8 by 53.3. BYU: 8 by 48.3. Oklahoma: 4 by 16.7. Cincinnati: 10 by 61.7. Baylor: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins1.2 · n=8 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · n=4 · -0.7 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · n=7 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · n=6 · +0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
TCU
Best efficiency game
75.8 vs TCU
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/27 | vs North Carolina10+ tackles | W 30-10 | 12 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/26 | @ Baylor | W 34-31 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Cincinnati10+ tackles | W 42-21 | 10 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Oklahoma | L 20-59 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs BYU | W 37-7 | 8 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ UCF | W 41-28 | 8 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Oklahoma State | L 34-48 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/12 | @ Houston | L 39-41 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/1 | @ TCU10+ tackles | W 24-21 | 11 | 8 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Texas Tech | W 20-13 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Pittsburgh | W 17-6 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Penn State10+ tackles | L 15-38 | 13 | 7 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Syracuse
2019-2021
Opening stop
- 2
West Virginia
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
201920202021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Syracuse | 0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Syracuse | 3 | 20.9 | 5.1 | 3 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Syracuse | 0 | — | — | -3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | West Virginia | 9 | 38.8 | 11 | 9 |
| 2023 Postseason | West Virginia | 11.5 | 39.6 | 11.6 | 2.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | West Virginia | 11.5 | 39.6 | 11.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 69.9 takeover score.
#2
TCU
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 63.5 takeover score.
#3
Liberty
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.4 takeover score.
#4
UCF
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.6 takeover score.
#5
Cincinnati
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Syracuse
0 primary output · 4.2 efficiency · 0.7 usage
35
#2
2023 Postseason · West Virginia
24.4
11.5 primary · 39.6 efficiency · 11.6 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · West Virginia
24.4
11.5 primary · 39.6 efficiency · 11.6 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
1
Splash games
7
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8897
Parkland · Winston Salem, NC
- Committed To
- Syracuse
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
233
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.