Player Stats

Jha'Quan Jackson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,743
Receptions
109
Touchdowns
20

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonTulane2231154.8
2020 PostseasonTulane11269270.8
2020 Regular SeasonTulane1129356770.8
2021 Regular SeasonTulane1217294151.6
2022 PostseasonTulane14187169.8
2022 Regular SeasonTulane1432467469.8
2023 Regular SeasonTulane1026439472.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Tulane paired 439 primary output with 87.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 87.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: South Alabama

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Tulane

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

43.9

Efficiency

87.3

Usage

17.7

Consistency

63.3

Best Game by takeover score

South Alabama

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 106. Ole Miss: 83. Southern Miss: 41. Nicholls: 0. UAB: 29. Memphis: 46. North Texas: 24. Rice: 44. East Carolina: 48. SMU: 18

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 3 by 100. Ole Miss: 4 by 100. Southern Miss: 2 by 100. UAB: 2 by 96.7. Memphis: 6 by 51.1. North Texas: 2 by 80. Rice: 3 by 97.8. East Carolina: 2 by 100. SMU: 2 by 60

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins42.3 · Games = 8 · -8.3 vs Losses
Losses50.5 · Games = 2 · +8.3 vs Wins