Usage Score
3.5
Player Dossier
2019-2023Marshall
DB • 5'11" • 185 lbs • Tampa, FL, USA
Micah Abraham shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
3.5
Efficiency
26.2
Consistency
15.4
Season Value
24.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Marshall
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Micah Abraham, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Marshall. Micah Abraham shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.2 disruption score.
Micah Abraham played DB for Marshall. Across 5 tracked seasons, Micah Abraham recorded 148 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2022 with Marshall.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Marshall paired 16 primary output with 24.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 26.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: James Madison
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
26.2
Usage
3.5
Consistency
15.4
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 3. Unknown: 0. East Carolina: 3. Virginia Tech: 3. Old Dominion: 0. NC State: 0. Georgia State: 0. James Madison: 4. Coastal Carolina: 0. App State: 0. Georgia Southern: 3. South Alabama: 0. Arkansas State: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 5 by 50.8. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. East Carolina: 1 by 34.2. Virginia Tech: 4 by 46.7. Old Dominion: 1 by 4.2. NC State: 1 by 4.2. Georgia State: 3 by 12.5. James Madison: 3 by 52.5. Coastal Carolina: 4 by 16.7. App State: 3 by 12.5. Georgia Southern: 4 by 46.7. South Alabama: 2 by 8.3. Arkansas State: 3 by 42.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
James Madison
Best efficiency game
52.5 vs James Madison
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/20 | vs UTSA | L 17-35 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Arkansas State | W 35-21 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ South Alabama | L 0-28 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Georgia Southern | W 38-33 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ App State | L 9-31 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 6-34 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/19 | vs James Madison | L 9-20 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Georgia State | L 24-41 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ NC State | L 41-48 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Old Dominion | W 41-35 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Virginia Tech | W 24-17 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ East CarolinaSplash game | W 31-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Marshall
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Marshall | 4.5 | 19.5 | 4.4 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Marshall | 4.5 | 19.5 | 4.4 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Marshall | 1 | 7.9 | 1.1 | -3.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Marshall | 15.5 | 24.4 | 2.5 | 14.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Marshall | 15.5 | 24.4 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Marshall | 16 | 24.7 | 6.2 | 0.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Marshall | 16 | 24.7 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Marshall | 19 | 26.2 | 3.5 | 3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Marshall | 19 | 26.2 | 3.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
App State
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.2 takeover score.
#2
Notre Dame
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.9 takeover score.
#3
James Madison
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 53.5 takeover score.
#4
Louisiana
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.7 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
1.5
Primary metric
Game with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 45.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Marshall
16 primary output · 24.7 efficiency · 6.2 usage
37.2
#2
2022 Regular Season · Marshall
37.2
16 primary · 24.7 efficiency · 6.2 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Marshall
29.1
15.5 primary · 24.4 efficiency · 2.5 usage
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8156
East Lake · Bradenton, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
148
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 54 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.