Player Stats

Chris Adimora College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
104
TFL
3
Sacks
0.5
QB hurries
3
Passes defended
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 PostseasonTexas61-0-1017.3
2019 Regular SeasonTexas69-0-1017.3
2020 PostseasonTexas105-0--045
2020 Regular SeasonTexas10411.50-3045
2021 Regular SeasonTexas8100.50.5-2022.3
2022 Regular SeasonSMU914-01-011.4
2023 PostseasonSMU101-0--031.8
2023 Regular SeasonSMU1023102-031.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason

Texas paired 5.5 primary output with 24.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 14 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas, SMU.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Postseason · SMU

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

0.4

Efficiency

14

Usage

3.3

Consistency

13.3

Best Game by takeover score

Louisiana Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1. Prairie View A&M: 0. TCU: 0. Charlotte: 1. East Carolina: 0. Temple: 1. Tulsa: 0. Rice: 1. North Texas: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boston College: 1 by 4.2. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 26.7. Prairie View A&M: 3 by 12.5. TCU: 2 by 8.3. Charlotte: 3 by 22.5. East Carolina: 1 by 4.2. Temple: 2 by 18.3. Tulsa: 4 by 16.7. Rice: 1 by 14.2. North Texas: 3 by 12.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.5 · Games = 8 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 2 · -0.5 vs Wins