Usage Score
2
Player Dossier
2019-2023Tennessee
Roman Harrison
DL • 6'2" • 235 lbs • Bainbridge, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Roman Harrison shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
9.8
Consistency
6.7
Season Value
5.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Tennessee
1919202121222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Roman Harrison, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Tennessee. Roman Harrison shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 9.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Tennessee paired 9 primary output with 22.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 9.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Tennessee
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.1
Efficiency
9.8
Usage
2
Consistency
6.7
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 1. Virginia: 0. Unknown: 0. Florida: 0. UTSA: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Alabama: 0. Kentucky: 0. UConn: 0.5. Georgia: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 1 by 14.2. Virginia: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Florida: 1 by 4.2. UTSA: 5 by 20.8. Texas A&M: 1 by 4.2. Alabama: 1 by 4.2. Kentucky: 2 by 8.3. UConn: 2 by 13.3. Georgia: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.3 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half0.2 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.1 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
20.8 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | vs Iowa | W 35-0 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Georgia | L 10-38 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs UConn | W 59-3 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Kentucky | W 33-27 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Alabama | L 20-34 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Texas A&M | W 20-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs UTSA | W 45-14 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Florida | L 16-29 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Virginia | W 49-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
20192019202020212021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Tennessee | 4 | 12.3 | 4.5 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tennessee | 4 | 12.3 | 4.5 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Tennessee | 5 | 13.2 | 7.4 | 1 |
| 2021 Postseason | Tennessee | 4.5 | 15.6 | 3.7 | -0.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Tennessee | 4.5 | 15.6 | 3.7 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Tennessee | 9 | 22.2 | 5.5 | 4.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Tennessee | 1.5 | 9.8 | 2 | -7.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Tennessee | 1.5 | 9.8 | 2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 59.4 takeover score.
#2
Georgia
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.8 takeover score.
#3
Alabama
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48 takeover score.
#4
Vanderbilt
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.8 takeover score.
#5
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Tennessee
9 primary output · 22.2 efficiency · 5.5 usage
15.1
#2
2020 Regular Season · Tennessee
11.2
5 primary · 13.2 efficiency · 7.4 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Tennessee
9.9
4.5 primary · 15.6 efficiency · 3.7 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9034
Bainbridge · Bainbridge, GA
- Committed To
- Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
106
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.