Player Stats

Kamal Hadden College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
78
TFL
5.5
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
10
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 PostseasonTennessee62-0--036.8
2021 Regular SeasonTennessee61520-1036.8
2022 Regular SeasonTennessee8423.5012055.2
2023 Regular SeasonTennessee719-017253

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Tennessee paired 8.5 primary output with 32.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 27 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Austin Peay

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Tennessee

Games

7

Havoc Plays / G

1.6

Efficiency

27

Usage

3.7

Consistency

53.9

Best Game by takeover score

Austin Peay

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Virginia: 2. Austin Peay: 4. Florida: 0. UTSA: 0. South Carolina: 2. Texas A&M: 3. Alabama: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia: 0 by 20. Austin Peay: 3 by 52.5. Florida: 7 by 29.2. UTSA: 2 by 8.3. South Carolina: 3 by 32.5. Texas A&M: 2 by 38.3. Alabama: 2 by 8.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.2 · Games = 5 · +2.2 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 2 · -2.2 vs Wins