Player Stats

Renardo Green College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
142
TFL
6
Sacks
0.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
20

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonFlorida State5610-2024.7
2020 Regular SeasonFlorida State5270.50-1021.4
2021 Regular SeasonFlorida State514-0-1010.3
2022 Regular SeasonFlorida State125220-4025.9
2023 Regular SeasonFlorida State13432.50.5112052.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Florida State paired 17 primary output with 26.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 26.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Florida State

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.3

Efficiency

26.9

Usage

4.3

Consistency

46.4

Best Game by takeover score

Miami

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. LSU: 2. Southern Miss: 1. Boston College: 1. Clemson: 1. Virginia Tech: 1. Syracuse: 1. Duke: 2. Wake Forest: 3. Pittsburgh: 0. Miami: 2. North Alabama: 0. Florida: 0. Louisville: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 4 by 36.7. Southern Miss: 0 by 10. Boston College: 5 by 30.8. Clemson: 7 by 39.2. Virginia Tech: 2 by 18.3. Syracuse: 1 by 14.2. Duke: 2 by 28.3. Wake Forest: 3 by 42.5. Pittsburgh: 6 by 25. Miami: 5 by 40.8. North Alabama: 4 by 16.7. Florida: 4 by 16.7. Louisville: 0 by 30

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half1.3 · Games = 7 · -0.0 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · Games = 6 · +0.0 vs First Half