Usage Score
18.6
Player Dossier
2017-2021Troy
Kaylon Geiger
WR • 5'10" • 170 lbs • Fort Worth, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Kaylon Geiger reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
62.5
Consistency
34.3
Season Value
43.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Troy
171819202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Troy • Texas Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Coastal Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kaylon Geiger, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Troy. Kaylon Geiger reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Troy paired 873 primary output with 67.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 62.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Troy, Texas Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Texas Tech
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
41
Efficiency
62.5
Usage
18.6
Consistency
34.3
Best Game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 9. Houston: 11. Unknown: 0. Florida International: 121. Texas: 100. West Virginia: 79. TCU: 85. Kansas: 37. Kansas State: 0. Oklahoma: 22. Iowa State: 14. Oklahoma State: 11. Baylor: 44
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Mississippi State: 4 by 15. Houston: 3 by 24.4. Florida International: 6 by 100. Texas: 5 by 100. West Virginia: 6 by 87.8. TCU: 5 by 100. Kansas: 3 by 82.2. Kansas State: 2 by 0. Oklahoma: 2 by 73.3. Iowa State: 3 by 31.1. Oklahoma State: 2 by 36.7. Baylor: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins45.2 · n=6 · +1.5 vs Losses
Losses43.7 · n=6 · -1.5 vs Wins
First Half57.9 · n=7 · +36.5 vs Second Half
Second Half21.3 · n=6 · -36.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
100 vs Baylor
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/28 | vs Mississippi State | W 34-7 | — | 4 | 9 | 3.9 | 2.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Baylor | L 24-27 | — | 2 | 44 | 18.3 | 22 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 11/21 | vs Oklahoma State | L 0-23 | — | 2 | 11 | 7 | 5.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Iowa State | W 41-38 | — | 3 | 14 | 4.7 | 4.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Oklahoma | L 21-52 | — | 2 | 22 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Kansas State | L 24-25 | — | 2 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Kansas | W 41-14 | — | 3 | 37 | 10.4 | 12.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs TCU | L 31-52 | — | 5 | 85 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 55 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ West Virginia | W 23-20 | — | 6 | 79 | 11.1 | 13.20 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Texas100 receiving yards | L 35-70 | — | 5 | 100 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Florida International100 receiving yards | W 54-21 | — | 6 | 121 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 0 | 52 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Houston | W 38-21 | — | 3 | 11 | 3 | 3.70 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Troy
2017-2020
Opening stop
- 2
Texas Tech
2021
Final stop
Season Progression
201720182019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Troy | 873 | 67.9 | 24.7 | 873 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Troy | 752 | 74 | 21.7 | -121 |
| 2021 Postseason | Texas Tech | 533 | 62.5 | 18.6 | -219 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 533 | 62.5 | 18.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Coastal Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
145
Primary metric
145 receiving yards with a 80.6 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas State
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida International
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas State
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
118
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Troy
873 primary output · 67.9 efficiency · 24.7 usage
61.5
#2
2020 Regular Season · Troy
58.1
752 primary · 74 efficiency · 21.7 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Texas Tech
43.4
533 primary · 62.5 efficiency · 18.6 usage
Milestones
11
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8633
Eastside Catholic · Sammamish, WA
- Committed To
- Washington State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,158
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.