Player Stats

Tahj Gary College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
276
Rushing yards
272
Receiving yards
4
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech124240048.8
2020 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech00000-
2021 Regular SeasonVirginia Tech00000-
2022 Regular SeasonTulsa361610041.4
2023 Regular SeasonTulsa51911874264.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Tulsa paired 191 primary output with 57.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 57.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Virginia Tech, Tulsa.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Temple

Win with 63 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Tulsa

Games

5

Scrimmage Yards / G

38.2

Efficiency

57.5

Usage

11.4

Consistency

67.7

Best Game by takeover score

Temple

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 12. Oklahoma: 12. Northern Illinois: 51. Temple: 63. Florida Atlantic: 53

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 2 by 62.5. Oklahoma: 6 by 20.8. Northern Illinois: 8 by 66.4. Temple: 7 by 87.5. Florida Atlantic: 11 by 50.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins42 · Games = 3 · +9.5 vs Losses
Losses32.5 · Games = 2 · -9.5 vs Wins