Usage Score
2.8
Player Dossier
2019-2023UTSA
CB • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Roswell, GA, USA
Nicktroy Fortune shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
2.8
Efficiency
18.3
Consistency
70.1
Season Value
30.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nicktroy Fortune, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UTSA. Nicktroy Fortune shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 18.3 disruption score.
Nicktroy Fortune played CB for West Virginia and UTSA. Across 5 tracked seasons, Nicktroy Fortune recorded 138 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2022 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
UTSA paired 12 primary output with 18.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 18.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across West Virginia, UTSA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
18.3
Usage
2.8
Consistency
70.1
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 2. Houston: 0. Texas State: 1. Army: 0. Tennessee: 0. Temple: 1. UAB: 1. Florida Atlantic: 1. East Carolina: 1. North Texas: 2. Rice: 1. South Florida: 1. Tulane: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 2 by 28.3. Houston: 1 by 4.2. Texas State: 1 by 14.2. Army: 4 by 16.7. Tennessee: 1 by 4.2. Temple: 3 by 22.5. UAB: 3 by 22.5. East Carolina: 2 by 18.3. North Texas: 3 by 32.5. Rice: 1 by 14.2. South Florida: 4 by 26.7. Tulane: 1 by 14.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
32.5 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/20 | @ Marshall | W 35-17 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Tulane | L 16-29 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs South Florida | W 49-21 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Rice | W 34-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ North Texas | W 37-29 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs East Carolina | W 41-27 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 36-10 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/15 | vs UAB | W 41-20 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Temple | W 49-34 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Tennessee | L 14-45 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/15 | vs Army | L 29-37 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Texas State | W 20-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Houston | L 14-17 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
West Virginia
2019-2021
Opening stop
UTSA
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | West Virginia | 3 | 13.8 | 2.5 | — |
| 2020 Postseason | West Virginia | 4 | 18.3 | 5.6 | 1 |
| 2020 Regular Season | West Virginia | 4 | 18.3 | 5.6 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | West Virginia | 2.5 | 18.4 | 3.7 | -1.5 |
| 2022 Postseason | UTSA | 8 | 20.2 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 8 | 20.2 | 5.5 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 12 | 18.3 | 2.8 | 4 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 12 | 18.3 | 2.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Houston
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.8 takeover score.
#2
Iowa State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 49.9 takeover score.
#3
Kansas State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.3 takeover score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
#5
North Texas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · UTSA
12 primary output · 18.3 efficiency · 2.8 usage
30.5
#2
2023 Regular Season · UTSA
30.5
12 primary · 18.3 efficiency · 2.8 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · UTSA
21.3
8 primary · 20.2 efficiency · 5.5 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8607
Central Gwinnett · Lawrenceville, GA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
138
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.