Usage Score
2.8
Player Dossier
2019-2023Miami (OH)
Austin Ertl
DL • 6'2" • 285 lbs • Wauwatosa, WI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Austin Ertl shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17 disruption score.
Efficiency
17
Consistency
14.3
Season Value
13.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
19202121222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Miami (OH)
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Ertl, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Miami (OH). Austin Ertl shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 17 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Miami (OH) paired 1 primary output with 9.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 17 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Miami (OH)
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
17
Usage
2.8
Consistency
14.3
Best Game by takeover score
App State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. App State: 0. Miami: 0. Massachusetts: 1. Cincinnati: 0. Unknown: 0. Kent State: 2.5. Bowling Green: 0. Western Michigan: 1. Toledo: 0. Ohio: 1. Akron: 1. Buffalo: 1. Ball State: 0. Toledo: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. App State: 2 by 8.3. Miami: 4 by 16.7. Massachusetts: 3 by 22.5. Cincinnati: 4 by 16.7. Unknown: 1 by 4.2. Kent State: 4 by 41.7. Bowling Green: 1 by 4.2. Western Michigan: 3 by 22.5. Toledo: 3 by 12.5. Ohio: 3 by 22.5. Akron: 0 by 10. Buffalo: 6 by 35. Ball State: 2 by 8.3. Toledo: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=10 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=3 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · n=7 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · n=7 · +0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
41.7 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/16 | @ App State | L 9-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | @ Toledo | W 23-14 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Ball State | W 17-15 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/16 | vs Buffalo | W 23-10 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 11/9 | vs Akron | W 19-0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Ohio | W 30-16 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Toledo | L 17-21 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Western Michigan | W 34-21 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Bowling Green | W 27-0 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Kent State | W 23-3 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Cincinnati | W 31-24 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Massachusetts | W 41-28 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 9/1 | @ Miami | L 3-38 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Miami (OH)
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
2019202020212021202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 0.5 | 4.8 | 1 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 1 | 9.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 7 | 20.4 | 4.7 | 6 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 7 | 20.4 | 4.7 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 5.5 | 18 | 5.7 | -1.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Miami (OH) | 7.5 | 17 | 2.8 | 2 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Miami (OH) | 7.5 | 17 | 2.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Bowling Green
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.1 takeover score.
#2
Northwestern
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#3
Kent State
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 49.7 takeover score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.4 takeover score.
#5
North Texas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
1 primary output · 9.2 efficiency · 0.7 usage
15.6
#2
2021 Postseason · Miami (OH)
13.9
7 primary · 20.4 efficiency · 4.7 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Miami (OH)
13.9
7 primary · 20.4 efficiency · 4.7 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.7906
Wauwatosa West · Milwaukee, WI
- Committed To
- Miami (OH)
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
116
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.