Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2019-2023UTSA
Lucas Dean
P • 6'2" • 215 lbs • Dunsborough, Australia
Impact contributor
Lucas Dean shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
100
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · UTSA
192020212122222323
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lucas Dean, P. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · UTSA. Lucas Dean shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lucas Dean played P for UTSA. Across 5 tracked seasons, Lucas Dean recorded 22 passing yards and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2019 with UTSA.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
UTSA paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · UTSA
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 0. Houston: 0. Texas State: 0. Army: 0. Tennessee: 0. Temple: 0. UAB: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. East Carolina: 0. North Texas: 0. Rice: 0. South Florida: 0. Tulane: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 9 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 4 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0 · Games = 7 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 6 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
— vs Marshall
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/20 | @ Marshall | W 35-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Tulane | L 16-29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs South Florida | W 49-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Rice | W 34-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ North Texas | W 37-29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs East Carolina | W 41-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 36-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/15 | vs UAB | W 41-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Temple | W 49-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Tennessee | L 14-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 9/15 | vs Army | L 29-37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Texas State | W 20-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Houston | L 14-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920202020202120212022202220232023
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisiana Tech
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0
Primary metric
0 primary-metric impact.
#2
Florida Atlantic
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#3
Southern Miss
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#4
Old Dominion
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
Texas A&M
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · UTSA
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2020 Postseason · UTSA
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · UTSA
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.7974
ProKick Australia · Australia, AUST
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 63 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.