Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
North Texas paired 542 primary output with 71.9 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | TCU | 1 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 53.2 |
| 2020 Regular Season | TCU | 6 | 16 | 176 | 0 | 49.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | TCU | 8 | 14 | 257 | 2 | 63.7 |
| 2022 Postseason | TCU | 5 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 47.4 |
| 2022 Regular Season | TCU | 5 | 4 | 48 | 0 | 47.4 |
| 2023 Regular Season | North Texas | 10 | 24 | 385 | 2 | 66.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | North Texas | 12 | 40 | 542 | 7 | 68 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
North Texas paired 542 primary output with 71.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 71.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across TCU, North Texas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
45.2
Efficiency
71.9
Usage
12.3
Consistency
59.1
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 25. Stephen F. Austin: 39. Texas Tech: 1. Wyoming: 40. Tulsa: 115. Florida Atlantic: 21. Memphis: 87. Tulane: 29. Army: 16. UTSA: 69. East Carolina: 59. Temple: 41
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 1 by 100. Stephen F. Austin: 3 by 86.7. Texas Tech: 1 by 6.7. Wyoming: 4 by 66.7. Tulsa: 2 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 70. Memphis: 5 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 64.4. Army: 3 by 35.6. UTSA: 5 by 92. East Carolina: 8 by 49.2. Temple: 3 by 91.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.