Usage Score
12.3
Player Dossier
2019-2024TCU
WR • 5'11" • 185 lbs • Lubbock, TX, USA
Blair Conwright reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.3
Efficiency
71.9
Consistency
59.1
Season Value
60.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Blair Conwright, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · North Texas. Blair Conwright reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
North Texas paired 542 primary output with 71.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 71.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across TCU, North Texas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
45.2
Efficiency
71.9
Usage
12.3
Consistency
59.1
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. South Alabama: 25. Unknown: 39. Texas Tech: 1. Wyoming: 40. Tulsa: 115. Florida Atlantic: 21. Memphis: 87. Tulane: 29. Army: 16. UTSA: 69. East Carolina: 59. Temple: 41
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. South Alabama: 1 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 86.7. Texas Tech: 1 by 6.7. Wyoming: 4 by 66.7. Tulsa: 2 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 70. Memphis: 5 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 64.4. Army: 3 by 35.6. UTSA: 5 by 92. East Carolina: 8 by 49.2. Temple: 3 by 91.1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Temple | W 24-17 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs East CarolinaHigh volume · 2+ TD | L 28-40 | — | 8 | 59 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 2 | 18 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ UTSA | L 27-48 | — | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Army | L 3-14 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Tulane | L 37-45 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Memphis | L 44-52 | — | 5 | 87 | 17.4 | 17.40 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 41-37 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Tulsa100 receiving yards | W 52-20 | — | 2 | 115 | 57.5 | 57.50 | 1 | 96 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Wyoming | W 44-17 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Texas Tech | L 21-66 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ South Alabama | W 52-38 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 25 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
TCU
2019-2022
Opening stop
North Texas
2023-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | TCU | 25 | 55.6 | 15.8 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | TCU | 176 | 60.4 | 13.5 | 151 |
| 2021 Regular Season | TCU | 257 | 95 | 12.2 | 81 |
| 2022 Postseason | TCU | 63 | 81.3 | 5.5 | -194 |
| 2022 Regular Season | TCU | 63 | 81.3 | 5.5 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | North Texas | 385 | 91.5 | 11.7 | 322 |
| 2024 Regular Season | North Texas | 542 | 71.9 | 12.3 | 157 |
#1 Featured game
Texas Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
46
Primary metric
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTSA
75
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
California
52
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
115
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa State
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · North Texas
542 primary output · 71.9 efficiency · 12.3 usage
60.4
#2
2023 Regular Season · North Texas
59.4
385 primary · 91.5 efficiency · 11.7 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · TCU
56.4
257 primary · 95 efficiency · 12.2 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8633
Coronado · Lubbock, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,448
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Blair Conwright quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit