Usage Score
2.3
Player Dossier
2019-2024UTSA
Christian Clayton
DL • 6'3" • 335 lbs • Fort Worth, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Christian Clayton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 11.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
11.4
Consistency
51.9
Season Value
22.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · UTSA
192020212122232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Christian Clayton, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · UTSA. Christian Clayton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 11.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
UTSA paired 9.5 primary output with 18.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 11.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · UTSA
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
11.4
Usage
2.3
Consistency
51.9
Best Game by takeover score
Coastal Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Coastal Carolina: 1. Kennesaw State: 0.5. Texas State: 0.5. Texas: 1. East Carolina: 0. Rice: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. Tulsa: 1. Memphis: 0. Temple: 1. Army: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Coastal Carolina: 0 by 10. Kennesaw State: 1 by 9.2. Texas State: 2 by 13.3. Texas: 1 by 14.2. East Carolina: 1 by 4.2. Rice: 2 by 8.3. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 8.3. Tulsa: 3 by 22.5. Memphis: 1 by 4.2. Temple: 1 by 14.2. Army: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins0.5 · n=5 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · n=6 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · n=6 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · n=5 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
22.5 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/23 | vs Coastal Carolina | W 44-15 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Army | L 24-29 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Temple | W 51-27 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Memphis | W 44-36 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Tulsa | L 45-46 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 38-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Rice | L 27-29 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ East Carolina | L 20-30 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Texas | L 7-56 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Texas State | L 10-49 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Kennesaw State | W 28-16 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2019-2024
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920202020202120212022202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 9.5 | 18.3 | 7.9 | 9.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 9.5 | 18.3 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTSA | 1.5 | 8.6 | 2.5 | -8 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 1.5 | 8.6 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 2 | 10.3 | 2.8 | 0.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 0.5 | 7.8 | 1.8 | -1.5 |
| 2024 Postseason | UTSA | 5 | 11.4 | 2.3 | 4.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UTSA | 5 | 11.4 | 2.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.9 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 44.6 takeover score.
#3
San Diego State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.3 takeover score.
#4
Tulsa
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.4 takeover score.
#5
UAB
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 40.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · UTSA
9.5 primary output · 18.3 efficiency · 7.9 usage
28.6
#2
2020 Regular Season · UTSA
28.6
9.5 primary · 18.3 efficiency · 7.9 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · UTSA
22.3
5 primary · 11.4 efficiency · 2.3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.7906
South Hills · Fort Worth, TX
- Committed To
- UTSA
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
83
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.