Usage Score
5.9
Player Dossier
2019-2023Texas A&M
DB • 6'1" • 215 lbs • Waxahachie, TX, USA
Demani Richardson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.3 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.9
Efficiency
26.3
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
14
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Demani Richardson, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Demani Richardson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26.3 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 7 primary output with 30.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 26.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2023 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.6
Efficiency
26.3
Usage
5.9
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 0. Miami: 1. UL Monroe: 0. Auburn: 0. Arkansas: 0. Alabama: 0. Tennessee: 0. South Carolina: 1. Ole Miss: 1. Mississippi State: 3. Unknown: 1. LSU: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 3 by 12.5. Miami: 5 by 30.8. UL Monroe: 2 by 8.3. Auburn: 4 by 16.7. Arkansas: 5 by 20.8. Alabama: 6 by 25. Tennessee: 8 by 33.3. South Carolina: 6 by 35. Ole Miss: 7 by 39.2. Mississippi State: 4 by 46.7. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. LSU: 6 by 25
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
46.7 vs Mississippi State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ LSU | L 30-42 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Mississippi State | W 51-10 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Ole Miss | L 35-38 | 7 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs South Carolina | W 30-17 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Tennessee | L 13-20 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Alabama | L 20-26 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Arkansas | W 34-22 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Auburn | W 27-10 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs UL Monroe | W 47-3 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Miami | L 33-48 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs New Mexico | W 52-10 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Postseason | Texas A&M | 6 | 29.6 | 6.9 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 6 | 29.6 | 6.9 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Texas A&M | 4.5 | 24.4 | 5.3 | -1.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 4.5 | 24.4 | 5.3 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 12.5 | 32.7 | 7.5 | 8 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 7 | 30.5 | 5.3 | -5.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 7 | 26.3 | 5.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
LSU
Loss with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 65 takeover score.
#2
Oklahoma State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 59.7 takeover score.
#3
Auburn
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55 takeover score.
#4
Vanderbilt
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.9 takeover score.
#5
Mississippi State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Texas A&M
7 primary output · 30.5 efficiency · 5.3 usage
22.7
#2
2021 Regular Season · Texas A&M
22.6
12.5 primary · 32.7 efficiency · 7.5 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Texas A&M
16.9
4.5 primary · 24.4 efficiency · 5.3 usage
1
Impact games
4
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9629
Waxahachie · Waxahachie, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
302
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 56 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Demani Richardson quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit