Usage Score
32.2
Player Dossier
2019-2023UTSA
WR • 6'3" • 185 lbs • Spring, TX, USA
Joshua Cephus reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
32.2
Efficiency
75
Consistency
65.9
Season Value
68.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joshua Cephus, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · UTSA. Joshua Cephus reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Joshua Cephus played WR for UTSA. Across 5 tracked seasons, Joshua Cephus recorded 45 passing yards, -1 rushing yards, and 3,639 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2023 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
UTSA paired 1,151 primary output with 75 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
88.5
Efficiency
75
Usage
32.2
Consistency
65.9
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Marshall: 102. Houston: 123. Texas State: 40. Army: 84. Tennessee: 58. Temple: 81. UAB: 55. Florida Atlantic: 57. East Carolina: 183. North Texas: 69. Rice: 53. South Florida: 163. Tulane: 83
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Marshall: 7 by 97.1. Houston: 9 by 91.1. Texas State: 7 by 38.1. Army: 8 by 70. Tennessee: 7 by 55.2. Temple: 7 by 77.1. UAB: 7 by 52.4. Florida Atlantic: 7 by 54.3. East Carolina: 4 by 100. North Texas: 6 by 76.7. Rice: 5 by 70.7. South Florida: 9 by 100. Tulane: 6 by 92.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Florida
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/20 | @ Marshall100 receiving yards | W 35-17 | — | 7 | 102 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 1 | 44 |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Tulane | L 16-29 | — | 6 | 83 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs South Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | W 49-21 | — | 9 | 163 | 18.1 | 18.10 | 1 | 64 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Rice | W 34-14 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ North Texas | W 37-29 | — | 6 | 69 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs East Carolina100 receiving yards | W 41-27 | — | 4 | 183 | 45.8 | 45.80 | 1 | 84 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 36-10 | — | 7 | 57 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/15 | vs UAB2+ TD | W 41-20 | — | 7 | 55 | 7.9 | 7.90 | 2 | 11 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Temple | W 49-34 | — | 7 | 81 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Tennessee | L 14-45 | — | 7 | 58 | 6.1 | 8.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Fri 9/15 | vs ArmyHigh volume | L 29-37 | — | 8 | 84 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Texas State | W 20-13 | — | 7 | 40 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Houston100 receiving yards · High volume | L 14-17 | — | 9 | 123 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 28 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 153 | 82.5 | 10 | — |
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 547 | 63.3 | 27.3 | 394 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 547 | 63.3 | 27.3 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTSA | 803 | 72.3 | 24.5 | 256 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 803 | 72.3 | 24.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 985 | 71.4 | 26.1 | 182 |
| 2023 Postseason | UTSA | 1,151 | 75 | 32.2 | 166 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTSA | 1,151 | 75 | 32.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106
Primary metric
106 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
114
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
183
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
183 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Houston
106
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
South Florida
163
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
163 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · UTSA
1,151 primary output · 75 efficiency · 32.2 usage
68.3
#2
2023 Regular Season · UTSA
68.3
1,151 primary · 75 efficiency · 32.2 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · UTSA
67.2
985 primary · 71.4 efficiency · 26.1 usage
8
100+ receiving yards
12
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.7906
Dekaney · Houston, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
3,639
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 56 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.