Usage Score
22.5
Player Dossier
2019-2022Stanford
Elijah Higgins
WR • 6'3" • 234 lbs • Kyle, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Elijah Higgins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.7
Consistency
73.4
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Stanford
19202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Elijah Higgins, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Stanford. Elijah Higgins reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Stanford paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Stanford
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
58.7
Efficiency
75.7
Usage
22.5
Consistency
73.4
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 16. USC: 50. Washington: 37. Oregon: 44. Oregon State: 68. Notre Dame: 81. Arizona State: 73. UCLA: 7. Washington State: 77. Utah: 105. California: 69. BYU: 77
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 53.3. USC: 3 by 100. Washington: 4 by 61.7. Oregon: 6 by 48.9. Oregon State: 4 by 100. Notre Dame: 5 by 100. Arizona State: 6 by 81.1. UCLA: 1 by 46.7. Washington State: 6 by 85.6. Utah: 7 by 100. California: 8 by 57.5. BYU: 7 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins77 · n=2 · +17.7 vs Losses
Losses59.3 · n=9 · -17.7 vs Wins
First Half49.3 · n=6 · -18.7 vs Second Half
Second Half68 · n=6 · +18.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | vs BYU | L 26-35 | — | 7 | 77 | 11.5 | 11 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ CaliforniaHigh volume | L 20-27 | — | 8 | 69 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Utah100 receiving yards | L 7-42 | — | 7 | 105 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Washington State | L 14-52 | — | 6 | 77 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ UCLA | L 13-38 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Arizona State | W 15-14 | — | 6 | 73 | 12 | 12.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Notre Dame | W 16-14 | — | 5 | 81 | 14.2 | 16.20 | 0 | 38 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Oregon State | L 27-28 | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 10/2 | @ Oregon | L 27-45 | — | 6 | 44 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 28 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ Washington | L 22-40 | — | 4 | 37 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs USC | L 28-41 | — | 3 | 50 | 17 | 16.70 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
2019202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Stanford | 176 | 78.8 | 16.2 | 176 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Stanford | 502 | 64.6 | 20.8 | 326 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Stanford | 704 | 75.7 | 22.5 | 202 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona State
110
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UCLA
103
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UCLA
57
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
#5
Notre Dame
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Stanford
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2022 Regular Season · Stanford
66.2
704 primary · 75.7 efficiency · 22.5 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Stanford
51.7
502 primary · 64.6 efficiency · 20.8 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.96
Bowie · Austin, TX
- Committed To
- Stanford
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,382
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.