Player Stats

Bam Brima College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
43
TFL
5
Sacks
4
QB hurries
6
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonPittsburgh00-0--0-
2020 Regular SeasonPittsburgh11-0--037.5
2021 PostseasonPittsburgh4111--027.6
2021 Regular SeasonPittsburgh44-01-027.6
2022 Regular SeasonPittsburgh56-01-09
2023 Regular SeasonPittsburgh12314341051.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Pittsburgh paired 12 primary output with 20.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2023 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 20.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2023 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Virginia Tech

Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2023 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1

Efficiency

20.8

Usage

6.1

Consistency

33.3

Best Game by takeover score

Virginia Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wofford: 2. Cincinnati: 2. West Virginia: 0. North Carolina: 0. Virginia Tech: 5. Louisville: 0. Wake Forest: 0. Notre Dame: 1. Florida State: 0. Syracuse: 1. Boston College: 0. Duke: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wofford: 2 by 28.3. Cincinnati: 2 by 28.3. West Virginia: 5 by 20.8. North Carolina: 4 by 16.7. Virginia Tech: 3 by 62.5. Louisville: 2 by 8.3. Wake Forest: 2 by 8.3. Notre Dame: 2 by 18.3. Florida State: 1 by 4.2. Syracuse: 4 by 26.7. Boston College: 2 by 8.3. Duke: 2 by 18.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.7 · Games = 3 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · Games = 9 · +0.4 vs Wins