Player Stats

Boone Bonnema College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
62
TFL
5.5
Sacks
3.5
QB hurries
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan11-0--036.1
2020 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan11-0--037
2021 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan612-01-012.2
2022 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan34-0--037.7
2023 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan7183.52.52-062.6
2024 Regular SeasonWestern Michigan826211-028.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season

Western Michigan paired 8 primary output with 22.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 18.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2024 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Western Michigan

Games

8

Havoc Plays / G

0.5

Efficiency

18.5

Usage

4.3

Consistency

8.3

Best Game by takeover score

Wisconsin

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 2. Ohio State: 0. Bethune-Cookman: 0. Marshall: 0. Ball State: 0. Kent State: 2. Central Michigan: 0. Eastern Michigan: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 9 by 57.5. Ohio State: 1 by 4.2. Bethune-Cookman: 3 by 12.5. Marshall: 2 by 8.3. Ball State: 3 by 12.5. Kent State: 5 by 40.8. Central Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.5 · Games = 4 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 4 · +0 vs Wins