Player Stats

Prince Wallace-Bemah College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
171
TFL
18.5
Sacks
6
QB hurries
4
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonCharlotte3123.52.51-063.2
2020 Regular SeasonCharlotte00-0--0-
2021 Regular SeasonCharlotte620301-037.5
2022 Regular SeasonCharlotte12625221052.2
2023 Regular SeasonCharlotte8442.51.5--036.5
2024 Regular SeasonCharlotte7334.50--035.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season

Charlotte paired 7 primary output with 40 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 26.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Rice

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Regular Season · Charlotte

Games

7

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

26.1

Usage

6.8

Consistency

14.3

Best Game by takeover score

Rice

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. James Madison: 1.5. Indiana: 0. Rice: 2. East Carolina: 0. Tulane: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. UAB: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. James Madison: 6 by 40. Indiana: 3 by 12.5. Rice: 6 by 45. East Carolina: 2 by 8.3. Tulane: 2 by 8.3. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 20.8. UAB: 9 by 47.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 4 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 3 · -0.3 vs Wins