Player Stats

Darius Alexander College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
124
TFL
21
Sacks
8.5
QB hurries
9
Passes defended
12
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 Regular SeasonToledo00-0--0-
2020 Regular SeasonToledo4910--024
2021 Regular SeasonToledo102010-2013.8
2022 Regular SeasonToledo91961.513049.1
2023 PostseasonToledo131111-060.9
2023 Regular SeasonToledo13354.52.553060.9
2024 PostseasonToledo12611--254.8
2024 Regular SeasonToledo12346.52.524054.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason

Toledo paired 18 primary output with 25.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 27.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Toledo

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.5

Efficiency

27.2

Usage

7.7

Consistency

27.8

Best Game by takeover score

Miami (OH)

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 3. Massachusetts: 3.5. Mississippi State: 1. Western Kentucky: 2. Miami (OH): 7. Buffalo: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Eastern Michigan: 0. Central Michigan: 0.5. Ohio: 1. Akron: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 6 by 55. Massachusetts: 3 by 47.5. Mississippi State: 2 by 18.3. Western Kentucky: 3 by 32.5. Miami (OH): 7 by 79.2. Buffalo: 2 by 8.3. Northern Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Bowling Green: 3 by 12.5. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 16.7. Central Michigan: 2 by 13.3. Ohio: 3 by 22.5. Akron: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins2.1 · Games = 7 · +1.5 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 5 · -1.5 vs Wins