Player Stats

Lewis Cine College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
144
TFL
3.5
QB hurries
1
Passes defended
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2019 PostseasonGeorgia66-0--021.9
2019 Regular SeasonGeorgia6130.50-2021.9
2020 PostseasonGeorgia103-0--027.2
2020 Regular SeasonGeorgia104910-3027.2
2021 PostseasonGeorgia151210-1058.1
2021 Regular SeasonGeorgia15611018058.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason

Georgia paired 13 primary output with 28.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2021 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 28.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Clemson

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2021 Postseason · Georgia

Games

15

Havoc Plays / G

0.9

Efficiency

28.9

Usage

5.1

Consistency

61.3

Best Game by takeover score

Clemson

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112131415

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 2. Michigan: 0. Clemson: 2. UAB: 1. South Carolina: 1. Vanderbilt: 1. Arkansas: 1. Auburn: 1. Kentucky: 1. Florida: 0. Missouri: 1. Tennessee: 2. Charleston Southern: 0. Georgia Tech: 0. Alabama: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 7 by 49.2. Michigan: 5 by 20.8. Clemson: 9 by 57.5. UAB: 2 by 18.3. South Carolina: 6 by 35. Vanderbilt: 2 by 18.3. Arkansas: 0 by 10. Auburn: 3 by 22.5. Kentucky: 6 by 35. Florida: 8 by 33.3. Missouri: 4 by 26.7. Tennessee: 8 by 53.3. Charleston Southern: 1 by 4.2. Georgia Tech: 5 by 20.8. Alabama: 7 by 29.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.9 · Games = 14 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 1 · -0.9 vs Wins