Usage Score
13.1
Player Dossier
2019-2021Michigan
David Ojabo
LB • 6'5" • 250 lbs • Aberdeen, Scotland
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
David Ojabo shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
31.2
Consistency
58.7
Season Value
43.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Michigan
192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Ojabo, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Michigan. David Ojabo shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 31.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Michigan paired 26 primary output with 31.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 31.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2021 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Michigan
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2
Efficiency
31.2
Usage
13.1
Consistency
58.7
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 0. Washington: 2. Northern Illinois: 0. Rutgers: 0. Wisconsin: 5. Nebraska: 2. Northwestern: 4. Michigan State: 4. Indiana: 2. Penn State: 4. Maryland: 0. Ohio State: 2. Iowa: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 1 by 4.2. Washington: 2 by 28.3. Northern Illinois: 2 by 8.3. Rutgers: 3 by 12.5. Wisconsin: 7 by 79.2. Nebraska: 1 by 24.2. Northwestern: 1 by 44.2. Michigan State: 4 by 56.7. Indiana: 2 by 28.3. Penn State: 4 by 56.7. Maryland: 3 by 12.5. Ohio State: 3 by 32.5. Iowa: 2 by 18.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.8 · Games = 12
First Half1.9 · Games = 7 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half2.2 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs First Half
All Games2 · Games = 13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
79.2 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/5 | @ Iowa | W 42-3 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Ohio State | W 42-27 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Maryland | W 59-18 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Penn State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 21-17 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Indiana | W 29-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Michigan State2+ sacks · Splash game | L 33-37 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Northwestern | W 33-7 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Nebraska | W 32-29 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Wisconsin2+ sacks · Splash game | W 38-17 | 7 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Rutgers | W 20-13 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Northern Illinois | W 63-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/12 | vs Washington | W 31-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Western Michigan | W 47-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2019-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 26 | 31.2 | 13.1 | 26 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wisconsin
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 68.5 takeover score.
#2
Michigan State
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58 takeover score.
#3
Penn State
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 49.9 takeover score.
#4
Northwestern
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 45.1 takeover score.
#5
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 30 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Michigan
26 primary output · 31.2 efficiency · 13.1 usage
43.8
#2
2020 Regular Season · Michigan
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.7 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Michigan
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2019 · Rating 0.8986
Blair Academy · Blairstown, NJ
- Committed To
- Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2019
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
36
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.