Usage Score
22.2
Player Dossier
2019-2022Ole Miss
WR • 6'2" • 225 lbs • Brandon, MS, USA
Jonathan Mingo reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
22.2
Efficiency
78.9
Consistency
49
Season Value
62.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Ole Miss
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jonathan Mingo, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · Ole Miss. Jonathan Mingo reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Ole Miss paired 862 primary output with 78.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
71.8
Efficiency
78.9
Usage
22.2
Consistency
49
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 53. Troy: 26. Unknown: 103. Georgia Tech: 74. Tulsa: 54. Kentucky: 3. Vanderbilt: 247. LSU: 69. Texas A&M: 89. Alabama: 59. Arkansas: 45. Mississippi State: 40
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 3 by 100. Troy: 3 by 57.8. Unknown: 3 by 100. Georgia Tech: 3 by 100. Tulsa: 3 by 100. Kentucky: 1 by 20. Vanderbilt: 9 by 100. LSU: 4 by 100. Texas A&M: 4 by 100. Alabama: 7 by 56.2. Arkansas: 4 by 75. Mississippi State: 7 by 38.1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | vs Texas Tech | L 25-42 | — | 3 | 53 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 0 | 34 |
| Fri 11/25 | vs Mississippi State | L 22-24 | — | 7 | 40 | 3.4 | 5.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Arkansas | L 27-42 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Alabama | L 24-30 | — | 7 | 59 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Texas A&M | W 31-28 | — | 4 | 89 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 1 | 56 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ LSU | L 20-45 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Vanderbilt100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-28 | — | 9 | 247 | 27.4 | 27.40 | 2 | 72 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Kentucky | W 22-19 | — | 1 | 3 | 1.5 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Tulsa | W 35-27 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Georgia Tech | W 42-0 | — | 3 | 74 | 24.7 | 24.70 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 3 | 103 | 34.3 | 34.30 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Troy | W 28-10 | — | 3 | 26 | 7 | 8.70 | 0 | 16 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ole Miss
2019-2022
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 172 | 73.7 | 14 | — |
| 2020 Postseason | Ole Miss | 379 | 84.2 | 14.2 | 207 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 379 | 84.2 | 14.2 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Ole Miss | 346 | 73.8 | 15.9 | -33 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 346 | 73.8 | 15.9 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Ole Miss | 862 | 78.9 | 22.2 | 516 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 862 | 78.9 | 22.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Vanderbilt
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
247
Primary metric
247 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kentucky
128
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulane
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Alabama
74
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
99
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 94.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · Ole Miss
862 primary output · 78.9 efficiency · 22.2 usage
62.5
#2
2022 Regular Season · Ole Miss
62.5
862 primary · 78.9 efficiency · 22.2 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Ole Miss
46.7
379 primary · 84.2 efficiency · 14.2 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9157
Brandon · Brandon, MS
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,759
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jonathan Mingo quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit