Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Michigan paired 604 primary output with 77.4 efficiency.
Player Stats
Cornelius Johnson College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 2,045
- Receptions
- 139
- Touchdowns
- 14
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 3 | 4 | 61 | 1 | 39.1 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Michigan | 4 | 16 | 254 | 3 | 62.9 |
| 2021 Postseason | Michigan | 14 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 73.6 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan | 14 | 38 | 609 | 3 | 73.6 |
| 2022 Postseason | Michigan | 13 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 59.5 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Michigan | 13 | 30 | 469 | 6 | 59.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Michigan | 14 | 5 | 37 | 0 | 74.3 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Michigan | 14 | 42 | 567 | 1 | 74.3 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Michigan
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
43.1
Efficiency
77.4
Usage
21
Consistency
53.5
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 25. Alabama: 12. East Carolina: 71. UNLV: 82. Bowling Green: 71. Nebraska: 32. Minnesota: 86. Indiana: 15. Michigan State: 26. Purdue: 39. Penn State: 24. Maryland: 24. Ohio State: 33. Iowa: 64
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 3 by 55.6. Alabama: 2 by 40. East Carolina: 5 by 94.7. UNLV: 5 by 100. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. Nebraska: 2 by 100. Minnesota: 3 by 100. Indiana: 1 by 100. Michigan State: 3 by 57.8. Purdue: 2 by 100. Penn State: 2 by 80. Maryland: 3 by 53.3. Ohio State: 4 by 55. Iowa: 9 by 47.4
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
First Half54.1 · Games = 7 · +22 vs Second Half
Second Half32.1 · Games = 7 · -22 vs First Half
Next best actions
Keep exploring Cornelius Johnson
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.